Extra Credit

The painting Soldiers playing Cards and Dice (The Cheats) by Valentin de Boulogne is in the same room as Saint Sebastian by Tanzio Da Varallo and The Martyrdom of Saint Bartholomew by Juesepe De Ribera.  All three paintings have lights shining from above, as if it’s coming from the heavens.  Also, through the color choice, you can tell that the paintings are from the same period.  Five people are in Soldiers, four are in Bartholomew and three are in Sebastian.

The most important part of the paintings are the eyes.  Their eyes clearly have religious intention.  The Da Varallo and De Ribera paintings depict the figures, in the paintings, staring at the skies and the heavens.  Obviously these figures are supposed to represent good.  The Boulogne painting on the other hand shows every person looking down as if they are looking down into Hell.  This was a common way, from paintings in this era, to depict money as an evil.  My painting that I chose for the earlier essay, The Moneylender and His Wife, depicted a similar thing: money is an evil that threatens religion.

In the painting by de Boulogne, two men are playing cards, two men are playing dice and one man is observing the card game.  The four men that are playing the games are only immersed in themselves and their activity, while the observer is immersed in the card game.

YouTube Video-Tim of America

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmbXx8_myeg

A Review of a Suicide Note-Paper 5

What would you do if you had all the money in the world?  Would you donate it?  Invest it?  Buy a nice car or house?  Or would you live a life of extravagance like John Self, the embodiment of every vice that money can afford.  The lifestyle, the drinking, the smoking, the sex.  Would you live this way?  I’m sure quite a few more people would if they had the money.    

The novel Money, is a first-person account of the overindulging John Self, a 35 year old director of “controversial TV ads for smoking, drinking, junk food and nude magazines” (78), who finds himself living the life of his ads.  This entire novel is a quick overview of his overindulging lifestyle, all of which requires money.  Lots of money.  And it’s about how he uses this money, or rather “suicide note” (112).

There are certainly people in society who reflect John Self in most, if not all, shapes of life.  We see it in celebrities like Paris Hilton or Lindsay Lohan.  They binge on clubbing, drinking, sex and cocaine.  And there are others who are similar in this out of control lifestyle.  But this not the lifestyle of most people.  Of course, had Martin Amis targeted this book at the few people in society like John Self, it wouldn’t have been a very successful novel.  Or rather novelized suicide note.

Instead, this novel is an exaggeration of those urges which every human has.  Money, albeit an exaggeration, is an interpretation of what humans think, feel and desire.  Those urges to spend money on anything, drink alcohol, do drugs or have sex with as many women/men as possible, are in all of us.  These vices are in all of us. The difference between us and John, is that we can control ourselves.   

            One of the biggest things that money buys for John, is sex pornography.  Throughout the book, John fantasizes of sex or pornography, “whew, the stuff that hot fox was giving out, all miming so fluently with the pornography still fresh in my head” (51).  John’s pornography habit consisted of “three-mag-a-week and at-least-one-movie habit to sustain” (44).  Most people would probably say, in public, that this is disgraceful and untasteful.  Sure it may be untasteful, but reality is, most people have seen a pornography video at some point in their life.  And despite all the free pornography online today, it’s still a booming industry that makes billions of dollars.  So John is once again an exaggerated reflection of society and our urges and desires.  We might not be as open or flamboyant as John Self, but to say you’ve never done or wanted to do some of the things he’s done, would be an outright lie.

            One contention I had with this novel, was the confusing way in which this story was written as a “suicide note”.  The letter by John, along with the notification at the beginning of the novel just confused the hell out of me.  The notification at the beginning says that the novel “is a suicide note” and that “by the time you lay it aside, John Self will no longer exist”.  This was written in September 1981.  Yet right before the end, John writes a letter during the winter of 1981/1982 saying “I fucking nearly killed myself the other day” (351).  So he clearly hadn’t killed himself and he continued to exist in September 1981.

            This just leads to confusion to the status of John Self.  From the final letter, we realize that he has a more optimistic outlook on life, his new girlfriend and his new dad.  But this book is supposed to be one giant suicide note.  These contradictions are rather confusing and blurs the ending.  Maybe I missed something or I didn’t get the right message from the book.  But what I do not like from this book, was the ending.

            The ending of this novel should have been rewritten to better improve the meaning of the book.  As I mentioned earlier, I found the ending to be contradictory and downright confusing.  If the ending was more concrete, I believe the message that money was a facilitator of vices could have been stronger.  For instance, if he had committed suicide as a result of his downfall, the message would have been considerably stronger because of what it would imply: money, if misused and abused can bite you in the ass. 

            Despite the ending, though, I still think the book did an adequate job of reflecting society’s obsession with money and the vices in this world.  Everybody has the desires and urges.  Sex and drugs aren’t just for rock and roll stars or people with a lot of money.  We indulge in these things as well.  Just not as often or as open.  John Self represents people as they are with their deepest desires.  And even though the ending was a minor draw back, the book accurately portrays what we desire and how money facilitates these desires every step of the way.